Peeing with a F***ing Purpose

Follow the link here to the Google Drive folder containing all my pictures/video for the post.

Kensington Market is unquestionably my favourite neighbourhood in Toronto. Its vast cultural richness, laid back atmosphere, thriving alternative music scene, and collection of some of the best cafés, bars, and niche restaurants, have me frequenting this area of the city quite often. The wonderfully diverse and welcoming community is not without its problems, however. One may often find used syringes or rolling papers in the park where children play – not to mention the amount of illegal graffiti plastered around alleyways and buildings. Although some aspects are negative, the wonderfully flawed culture of this neighbourhood is intricately woven into its residents – who are, stereotypically speaking, eco-friendly, freedom-loving, cyclists coexisting alongside Toronto’s Chinatown and U of T’s St. George campus.

This piece of graffiti has been located at the topmost protrusion of the [formerly male] washroom since I first started visiting Café Pamenar. The washrooms are located adjacent to a storage room, down a flight of dark-stained, creaky, asymmetrical stairs. Mysterious and somewhat filthy, the Pamenar washrooms are the last place one wants to be; it's strictly business in there. This particular piece of graffiti equalizes the perfection of the beautiful upstairs with the raw unfiltered character of the downstairs. In neutralizing the energy of the café, the graffiti aids in making the space as a whole less intimidating. I personally feel safer in the space because I realize that even the most perfectly organized and decorated cafés can have their flaws. While bringing the space alive, the provocative imperfection this graffiti creates, aids in making me feel more comfortable and welcomed in the space.

The message that this particular quote portrays is that of frustration and loss of hope. The author of this particular quote indirectly exclaims that realizing when life has presented you with unfavourable circumstances is the first step in working towards improving your situation. They begin by stating that everyone is different and has a story. When the author concludes with “Be Fucked”, they suggest giving up self-command and, instead, realizing there are things with which we are presented that are beyond our control. Through vulgar language, a prime choice of location (at eye-level), and a powerful message, this particular piece of Latrinalia (graffiti on lavatory walls) creates and sustains the culture of this washroom, and café as a whole, by increasing its level of privateness, contributing to its classification as male-gendered, and ultimately making the space safer for all, more interesting and alive.

Washrooms, even those outside the home, are perhaps our most private regularly used spaces. The more private, the better; socializing is kept to a minimum and loitering inside is usually considered strange. Public washrooms are arguably the least public, publicly labeled, space in society – the gendered door sign controls who gets in and the lock on the stall door keeps them out. The role of latrinalia is to produce a message for an audience who, for better or worse, has nothing better to do than read the thoughts of the artist or author. However, by taking the opportunity to place graffiti on the walls of a washroom, the tagger has fundamentally transformed the space from public-private to ultra-private. To the best of my knowledge, this poem is nothing more than an impromptu scribble; however, by using a particular form of poetic structure invisible to the untrained mind, the author may be targeting a specific audience. In doing so, they create an even more exclusive and private space. The documentary “Claiming Space” speaks to a similar privatization of ‘public’ space. In this instance, contributor Megan Williams investigates the movements surrounding women loitering as a technique of reclaiming space. Williams spoke to two professors (and the authors of “Why Loiter?”) who found that using loitering as a technique to reclaim public space leads to an increased level of safety for women – women make themselves seen thereby neutralizing the gender of a space. (Williams, 2015) Just as women are starting to claim ownership of spaces not previously considered ‘theirs’, this piece of graffiti contributes to the reclaiming of a space not previously considered as belonging to the artist. By claiming this space, the graffiti influences how the author connects with the washroom; it belongs a little more to them as a result of this graffiti and they may feel more comfortable in the space while making it more private to others – those who do not understand the author’s poetic structure, message, or idea.

Washrooms, although generally very practical and secluded, are exceptionally gendered spaces. Individuals must often fall into either gender category to be permitted access to the space. Thankfully, the owners of Pamenar decided to abandon this philosophy and have recently taken down the “Male/Female Washroom” sign; apart from this, the space has remained largely the same (and significantly masculine-gendered). The progressive nature of the elimination of the gender restrictions speaks to the sustainment of the culture in Kensington Market – an area that, although profane and imperfect, is working toward improving their situation so that all may feel more welcomed. The profane language and contrasts between the graffiti found on the other [formerly female] washroom, contribute to the further advancement of the washroom’s masculine gender. The unafraid vulgarity, an aspect of the Kensington Culture, used in this particular piece makes the individual hyperaware that they are entering a male space. Using vulgarity often supports the societal definition of masculinity because it is outlandishly provocative and [more or less] courageously defies societal norms – two characteristics habitually considered masculine. Further, the fact that the washrooms were previously labeled “Male” and “Female” gave rise to immense differences between the types of graffiti between the two spaces, or lack thereof. When entering the formerly male washroom, one is immediately confronted with detailed images of penises, aggressively Sharpied tags, and profane poetry. The contrast is extremely evident when one enters the formerly female washroom where there exists very minimal sharpie ink. The Atlantic author Julie Beck writes about the tremendous differences between male and female washroom graffiti; she noticed that “the mere fact of being in a [gendered] public bathroom could skew how people present themselves when they uncap that Sharpie.” (Beck, 2014) While women were more inclined to write about love, she writes, men wrote more and about ‘dirtier’ things. The likelihood that this piece was drawn by a male is evidenced in the sharp distinction between these formerly officially gendered spaces and fundamentally supports Beck’s argument. Although well intentioned, the removal of the official gender label did little to neutralize the gender of this space as it is, clearly, still male-dominated.

Graffiti is a form of claiming and occupying space. By tagging and claiming ownership of a space, graffiti artists occupy and claim it as their own. Doreen Massey speaks much about the “Occupy” movement and how it was groundbreaking in, not only questioning the hierarchies of power which exist in society, but also how monumental the movement was in simply getting people to talk to one-another. In her interview with Social Science Bites, Massey was fascinated how the Occupy movement “created a [meaningful] space, [where] people didn’t just pass by each other on the way to work or shops or whatever, they talked, they conversed, they argued.” (Massey, 2013) Space, and ironically, its occupation, has the power to influence the ways in which people behave. It has the potential to bring about change as it gets people out talking and interacting with each other. Massey recognizes that these are all beginnings of social changes. As the Occupy movement created and championed discussions, arguments, and thought, latrinalia has the power to do much the same. By simply entering a space with graffiti, and especially graffiti such as this piece which is vulgar and thought provoking, one is forced to think, to question, and to form an opinion. It is through questioning and thought that the user is able to escape an otherwise dull routine of using public washrooms – the space is, therefore, transformed from an ordinary washroom to an interesting incubator of ideas and inquiry.

This piece of graffiti, its message rooted in hopelessness and frustration, is undoubtedly controversial and elicit. It serves the culture of Kensington Market, a culture of struggling artists and University students, all trying to make ends meet. It represents much more than the spontaneous modification of this washroom (a body of practicality and lethargy). The graffiti in this space must stay if it is to continue to encourage thought surrounding its male gender, its level of safety and of privateness, and its interruption of robotic and customary washroom conduct.

The graffiti is what completes this space; it forces one to see, to question, to f***ing think.

Reference List

Williams, M. (Contributor). (2015, May 15). Claiming Space [Radio series episode]. In Ideas with Paul Kennedy. Mumbai, Vienna: Paul Kennedy.

Beck, J. (2014, November 14). Behind the Writing on the Stalls. Retrieved October 29, 2015, from http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2014/11/behind-the-writing-on-the-stalls/ 383016/

Massey, D. (2013, February 1). [Online interview]. Retrieved October 29, 2015, from http:// www.socialsciencespace.com/2013/02/podcastdoreen-massey-on-space/ .

IMG_20151028_152248

IMG_20151028_152353

8 comments on “Peeing with a F***ing Purpose

  1. I found it really interesting how despite the fact that the bathrooms were no longer formally gendered, you were able to see how there were still remnants from that and that how it used to be gendered still effects the space.

    I was wondering though, considering that the spaces are no longer formally gendered, do you think the artist behind this latrinalia had a certain audience in mind? You mentioned that the graffiti was in such a spot that it was in your face and hard to not notice. Do you think that the artist had an idea of who might be looking and reading the graffit, or just wanted the message to get out to whoever possible?

  2. I really enjoyed your blog article Dru! J

    I find your argument interesting: you describe the space of the washroom as being masculine because it happens to be a space that holds what I would consider masculine stereotypes. For instance, you associate profane language with a male characteristic found in rather male washrooms, unlike female ones. Nevertheless, this is not my experience: I often see vulgar language in female washrooms – maybe under the cover of anonymity are women less likely to act accordingly to how we were socialized, i.e. to be submissive and soft? My experience also contrasts with what author Julie Beck, whom you cite, mentions. That being said, I agree with you that it still should be removed: the vulgarity of the language, whether it does or not make the space gendered, contributes to making it less public and inviting, and for the reason that it allows an individual to claim this space.

    I have felt that graffiti in bathrooms heterosexualize a space – I do not record any encountered graffiti about sex or love that was clearly of LGBTQ hand. Do you think that your graffiti ‘heterosexualizes’ your space?

  3. I could not keep my eyes off of your blog post! It was very well written and the flow between ideas was very well executed.
    I liked that you went into a depth about washroom graffiti that never really is talked about. We know this happens in public bathroom stalls, but in privately owned businesses such as this, is very unlikely. Perhaps this is because I have not had the privilege to have to urge to use them while in Kensington Market. It is amazing to now know so much about something that we usually don't pay much attention to if we were just to see it on a bathroom stall.
    My question for you would be, why do you think bathroom graffiti had such a large impact on you or this one in particular? Did you enjoy learning about it in the process of writing about this blog post? Because I sure enjoyed it while reading it!

  4. Your piece really grasped my attention compared to other pieces of graffiti because of the play on words that is illustrated. I feel like this type of washroom graffiti is something I have not seen since elementary school. I feel like this challenges our perception on how we view spaces as being gendered especially a washroom setting. There is no actual way to determine if this was a piece constructed by a male artist or female artist which is important to note but what stands out to me is that a washroom setting can have a message for both genders as an audience. Do you think that artists in these spaces have a clear gendered target in mind or would like to voice their opinion to a larger group?

  5. Re: jgillj

    This is such a great question! To the extent of my knowledge, this piece was drawn back when the space was still formally gendered. I mentioned this was at eye-level but I did not specify the circumstances in which people would notice this piece – I was referring to eye-level while peeing standing up! I, therefore, believe the audience, whether the artist thought about it or not, were individuals of average height who are able to pee standing up. I do not believe the author was intentionally targeting a specific audience; nevertheless, this specific audience has been targeted.

  6. Re: chloegs

    Chloé, you raise a great point when you say that vulgar language also exists in female washrooms – I suppose I do not have much experience in officially female-gendered washrooms as I identify as male. I believe women and men alike act differently, and perhaps more aggressively, under the anonymity which is created between washroom walls.

    It has also been my experience that graffiti on the walls of washrooms is somewhat heteronormative and I would support your point that it heterosexualizes the space. I often find that washrooms, especially those which hold official binary gender labels, are home to poetry and love-letters to members of the opposite gender, thus making the space a little less public/accessible for individuals who identify as LGBT+.

  7. Re: jkeltika

    Thank you for the kind words! I think washroom graffiti in general has a significant impact on me because I think of washrooms as tremendously practical, “get in and get out” types of spaces – latrinalia has the ability to interrupt that practicality! I like things that interrupt our daily routines and really get us thinking. I particularly like this piece because it shows how much can be said about a quick poem on a washroom wall; we were able to talk much about this piece of graffiti. I am glad you enjoyed reading it – I very much enjoyed learning about it. I was able to significantly dissect and analyze this piece; it not only enhanced my ability to write about space but it also made me more critical about everyday spaces.

  8. Re: matp1995

    Thank you, I am happy you enjoyed reading it!

    Now that you mention it, this graffiti is something you would find scribbled on an elementary school washroom. You are definitely correct in saying that both genders are able to benefit from, and interact with, this message while using the washroom. When the graffiti was first made, the washroom was still an officially male-gendered space so I believe the message was intended for a male audience. I am not sure if the artist would have proffered to voice this message to a larger crowd; however, as a result of the removal of the official gender label, the author is definitely attracting differently gendered people (i.e. both women, men, and people who identify as gender nonconforming).

Leave a Reply